Strategic Withdrawal Planning for a More Intentional Retirement

Feb 18 2026 | Back to Blog List

For most investors, the first half of their financial life is defined by accumulation. You build, save, and invest, all with any eye toward one objective: growing the portfolio.

Ben Franklin shown on a $100 billThat explains why retirement can throw so many people for a loop.

Now, instead of contributing to accounts, you begin drawing from them. Instead of deferring taxes indefinitely, withdrawals can begin triggering them. What once felt like steady forward progress can suddenly feel like erosion.

The fact that retirement is as much a psychological transition as a financial one is something we discuss often here at Cedar Point Capital Partners. It takes a shift in mindset to stop measuring success by how much you’re adding and start evaluating how thoughtfully you’re using what you’ve built.

For many of our clients, the hesitation isn’t about whether their portfolio is sufficient; it’s about gaining confidence that spending from it is both sustainable and intentional.

That confidence doesn’t come from a rule of thumb alone. It comes from having a strategic withdrawal plan that aligns your lifestyle, your tax picture, and your long-term goals so distributions feel purposeful rather than reactive.

In our previous Insights column on tax diversification, we discussed why where your assets are held matters. Strategic withdrawal planning is the next step. It is the process of deciding how to draw from your various investment and retirement accounts in a way that supports your lifestyle while managing lifetime tax exposure.

Retirement is not a single financial event; it is a multi-decade sequence of decisions. How you coordinate those decisions can meaningfully influence what you keep over time. Here’s how to start thinking about it.

Beyond the 4% Rule: Why Withdrawal Planning Is Personal

When people begin thinking about withdrawing from their retirement accounts, many are looking for an easy-to-understand framework that provides clarity and reassurance. A popular one you might be familiar with is the 4% rule.

The 4% rule is an oft-cited guideline that suggests a retiree could withdraw approximately 4% of their portfolio in the first year of retirement, then adjust that dollar amount for inflation each year thereafter. The original research used historical market returns and assumed a 30-year retirement time horizon with a balanced portfolio allocation, typically 50% stocks and 50% bonds. As with any rule of thumb, past market data doesn’t guarantee future results.

For example, if you retired with a portfolio of $2 million, a 4% withdrawal would generate $80,000 in your first year of retirement. If inflation were 3% the following year, your second-year withdrawal would increase to $82,400, and so on. The objective is to create a steady, inflation-adjusted income stream while allowing the remaining assets to remain invested for long-term growth.

The 4% rule has endured because of its simplicity, and can serve as a helpful reference for those early in the planning process, but it’s rarely a complete solution for modern retirees.

That’s because retirement income planning isn’t just about sustaining your portfolio for the rest of your life (although that’s part of it). It’s about coordinating multiple moving pieces: cash flow needs, tax exposure, market conditions, legacy goals, and changing personal priorities.

For most investors, the question isn’t, “What percentage can I take?” It’s, “How do I sustain the lifestyle I want while managing the taxes I’ll pay over time?”


💡Want to make financial decisions with more confidence? Get Cedar Point Capital Partners' monthly insights delivered to your inbox.


The Two Lenses of Strategic Withdrawal Planning

Answering that question requires stepping back from fixed withdrawal percentages and viewing retirement income through two primary lenses: cash flow and lifetime taxes.

Lens One: Cash Flow

The first lens is practical. What does retirement actually cost?

For many households, expenses don’t disappear in retirement, they shift. A mortgage may be paid off, reducing fixed obligations. Commuting and work-related costs often decline. At the same time, discretionary spending can increase through travel, time with family, or charitable giving.

In our experience, core lifestyle expenses—housing, dining, groceries, entertainment—often remain relatively consistent. What often changes are the surrounding categories.

Separating essential lifestyle spending from temporary or disappearing obligations helps determine how much income truly needs to come from your portfolio, and how much flexibility exists year to year.

But cash flow alone is only half the equation.

Lens Two: Lifetime Taxes

Every dollar withdrawn from a portfolio comes from somewhere, and the source determines how it will be taxed.

As we discussed in our previous Insights column, portfolio assets are typically spread across taxable brokerage accounts, pre-tax retirement accounts such as traditional IRAs and 401(k)s, and tax-free accounts like Roth IRAs. Drawing $100,000 from one account may produce a very different tax outcome than drawing the same amount from another.

Over a retirement that could span 25 or 30 years, those differences can compound.

Rather than focusing solely on minimizing this year’s tax bill, strategic withdrawal planning considers how today’s decisions influence future flexibility. When might taxable income temporarily dip? When might required minimum distributions (RMDs)—mandatory withdrawals from pre-tax retirement accounts that typically begin at age 73 under current law—increase your taxable income?

The goal is to structure withdrawals so taxable income is smoothed over time rather than concentrated in later years.

It’s important to remember that taxable income in retirement doesn’t just determine your marginal income tax bracket. It can also affect how much of your Social Security benefits are taxed and whether you trigger higher Medicare premiums through Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amounts (IRMAA). Even modest increases in income can move retirees across thresholds that raise their healthcare costs and cash flow needs for an entire year. (We explore IRMAA in more detail here.)

Strategic withdrawal planning sits at the intersection of these two lenses. But how do you put that understanding into practice?

Strategic Account Sequencing: Using Your Flexibility Intentionally

Once you begin viewing retirement through the lenses of cash flow and lifetime taxes, an important question naturally follows:

Are there years when we have more control than others?

For many retirees, the answer is yes.

The early years of retirement often provide a meaningful window of flexibility. Employment income has stopped, Social Security may not yet have begun and RMDs from pre-tax retirement accounts are still in the future. That creates room to be deliberate about how income is structured.

Rather than defaulting to a fixed withdrawal order, retirees should think strategically about account sequencing—deciding which accounts to draw from, and when.

Some may initially fund spending from taxable accounts, potentially taking advantage of favorable long-term capital gains treatment and allowing tax-deferred accounts to continue compounding. Others may intentionally draw from pre-tax retirement accounts earlier than required to potentially reduce the size of future RMDs. In certain cases, a framework can add clarity by maintaining short-term reserves for near-term spending while longer-term assets remain invested for growth.

Roth Conversions Can Help

Sequencing isn’t just about where income comes from; it’s about how much taxable income is intentionally recognized each year. This is where Roth conversions often enter the conversation.

A Roth conversion involves transferring a portion of assets from a traditional IRA or other pre-tax retirement account into a Roth IRA. The converted amount is included in taxable income in the year of the conversion. In exchange, future growth and qualified withdrawals from the Roth account can be tax-free, subject to IRS rules.

During those early retirement years when taxable income may dip, the relatively lower income tax bracket can create planning flexibility. Rather than leaving unused space within a current tax bracket, retirees may intentionally choose to convert pre-tax assets up to a targeted income level.

In practice, this might mean funding current spending from taxable accounts while selectively converting pre-tax assets to Roth each year. Again, the objective isn’t to eliminate taxes—it’s to manage their timing by recognizing income at controlled rates today in an effort to potentially reduce the likelihood of higher taxable income rates in later years.

There is no single sequencing approach that fits every situation. The appropriate sequence depends on income levels, account composition, tax brackets, longevity assumptions, and long-term objectives. We can help you design a distribution strategy that smooths income over time and aligns withdrawals with both lifestyle needs and tax efficiency.

How Giving and Legacy Fit into Your Withdrawal Plans

Strategic withdrawal planning doesn’t end with generating income. For many retirees, it also includes coordinating charitable intent and long-term legacy goals.

One frequently overlooked tool in this conversation is the Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD). Once you reach age 70½, retirees can direct charitable gifts directly from an IRA to a qualified organization, subject to annual IRS limits. If executed properly, those distributions can count toward satisfying required minimum distributions while being excluded from taxable income (which may also help limit Medicare premium surcharges).

Legacy planning also intersects with withdrawal strategy in other ways.

Under the SECURE Act, which applies to account owners who passed away after 2019, non-eligible designated beneficiaries (including many non-spouse beneficiaries) must fully distribute inherited retirement accounts within 10 years. Depending on circumstances, the beneficiary may also be subject to annual withdrawal requirements during that period.

Large pre-tax balances can therefore create additional taxable income for children during their peak earning years. Thoughtful withdrawal coordination—including gradual drawdowns or Roth conversions over time—may help reduce potential future income tax burden while increasing flexibility for the next generation.

You can learn more about inherited IRAs for adult beneficiaries in this Planning Corner video:


Bringing it All Together

For some retirees, the objective is to maximize lifetime spending. For others, it is to leave assets in a tax-aware manner. Most fall somewhere in between.

The common thread is intentionality.

Strategic withdrawal planning is not simply about sustaining a portfolio. It is about aligning distributions with your lifestyle, your tax picture, and the legacy you hope to create.

When those elements are coordinated thoughtfully, retirement income becomes less about reacting to tax rules—and more about aligning your wealth with your priorities.

If you’d like to evaluate how your withdrawal strategy fits into your broader tax and investment plan, we’re here to help. Reach out and let’s start a conversation.


The commentary on this blog reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of Cedar Point Capital Partners (CPCP) employees providing such comments and should not be regarded as a description of advisory services provided by CPCP or performance returns of any CPCP client. The views reflected in the commentary are subject to change at any time without notice. Nothing on this blog constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Cedar Point Capital Partners manages its clients’ accounts using a variety of investment techniques and strategies, which are not necessarily discussed in the commentary. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.